SFGAmWorld.com
Untitled Document
Park Information
Latest News
Great America
Roller Coasters
Rides
Hurricane Harbor
Water Slides
Water Attractions
Advertisement

Iron Wolf's Future

Talk about anything that has to do with Six Flags Great America and Hurricane Harbor here.
Postby CoastsToCoasters on June 1st, 2010, 1:35 am
Jcoaster95 wrote:Do you guys REALLY think they would replace it with something good, if anything at all?!

I love Iron Wolf, if you don't, then don't ride it. Simple as that.

The ride is in perfect condition. They would have no reason at all to remove it.


I love you ;) haha. I agree with what you said. :) I too love IW, love her she-wolf intensity haha. The "history" for it is great too...I feel wed be givin away a lung if she left us. Another thing is, I HOPE that IF OR when it departed its ways with SFGAm, that not only will another park give her the TLC she deserves to be once again kick ass, but that B&M gives us another new addition to our lineup. B&M loves SFGAm & AltonTowers...look at our lists of prototypes & products from them. SFGAm: 1st beemer ever(IW), first inverted(BTR), first hypertwister(RB), then SUF. With Alton: innovative invert(Nemesis), first vertical drop(Oblivion), new gen flyer(Air)...soooooo point is haha, sorry, damn jimmy, you just babble...I HOPE B&M still loves us! ;D
CoastsToCoasters

User avatar
 
Posts: 2352
Joined: September 5th, 2005, 12:41 am
Location: Chicago, IL.

Postby BP317 on June 1st, 2010, 9:24 am
The ride is in perfect condition


Iron Wolf has needed major foundation work several times and overall needs a lot of work if they want it to stay running for a long time. What was the last rides that needed a lot of maintenence work and was unpopular? I think its name was Shockwave. Ive always really liked Iron Wolf but its not worth putting a lot of money into for maintenence if people don't ride it especially with Chang in the park. I dont know how long they plan on keeping it running but im pretty sure they would take it out before taking it apart to work on the track and joints (which is why I think they are OK with bringing Chang into the park).
BP317
Webmaster/Site Admin

User avatar
 
Posts: 2135
Joined: September 2nd, 2006, 12:09 am

Postby CoastsToCoasters on June 1st, 2010, 2:44 pm
Sadly IronWolf is pretty much our next Shockwave, as many have said. Some of us loved Shoclwave, yes, just as we do IW but as a majority it doesn't do much for guests. I hate to say that cause deep down I know its true, it hurts cause of the love I have for that B&M. I've gone rounds on it alone as my family rode FiddlersFling. Its like our SLC...when I bring friends from out of state/country, they expect it to be hell based off what they think they know, & end up bein right and hateful twords it. I say this cause ill admit, I went on every Vekoma SLC with the intention it was gonna hurt & be awful, & ill especially never ride SFNEs again, I almost cried. Haha

IronWolf is a baby to us, yes but maybe its time to give her up for adoption...I'm sorry I'm jk. AS LONG as she gets the TLC at another park, I would be happy. Nonetheless, I have a feeling B&M may have somethin up their sleeves for us...I feel it(as all you roll your eyes) haha. We love them, they love us. ;)
CoastsToCoasters

User avatar
 
Posts: 2352
Joined: September 5th, 2005, 12:41 am
Location: Chicago, IL.

Postby Jcoaster95 on June 1st, 2010, 3:47 pm
No. Shockwave left because we wanted Superman.

Not because it didn't have enough riders or anything.
Gravity Group fan
Jcoaster95

User avatar
 
Posts: 273
Joined: May 27th, 2008, 8:37 pm
Location: gurnee, IL

Postby Paradise on June 1st, 2010, 5:59 pm
So before Iron Wolf was rumored to leave, everyone wanted it gone. Now that it's rumored to leave, everyone wants it to stay because "zomg it's wolfie!"....

Why the change of heart all the time?

We wanted Chang, now it's all but confirmed we're getting it and what happens? People are complaining because it's not a floorless.......Jeeeesus...
Have a take and don't suck, it's the Jim Rome Show!
Paradise

User avatar
 
Posts: 411
Joined: May 31st, 2009, 12:13 pm
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin

Postby SFaddiction84 on June 1st, 2010, 6:35 pm
Might i ask. Why we talk about Iron Wolfs Future and Removal just because we are getting Chang? Yes there both Stand up, but are not both American Eagle/Viper both Sit Down Wooden?

Iron Wolf does need to go, do not get me wrong, but the layouts of Chang/Iron Wolf are different, making them unique each so they can both stay for now, i just refuse to ride Iron Wolf :P
Trips Planned 2009: ?Unsure?
SFaddiction84

 
Posts: 470
Joined: August 11th, 2005, 10:36 am
Location: Burlington, WI

Postby monsterfan99 on June 1st, 2010, 8:55 pm
^Stand-up's are a gimmicks, unlike a wooden coaster.
monsterfan99

User avatar
 
Posts: 1693
Joined: September 23rd, 2008, 4:48 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Postby Ilovthevu' on June 1st, 2010, 9:44 pm
^^To me, it's probably because Chang is going to be better than Iron Wolf, and Iron Wolf bangs many people's heads. On top of it, I would like to say that Viper, and American Eagle are two different types of styles of wooden coasters. One is a out and back, and another is a cyclone type. Little Dipper is a kiddie wooden coaster. To me, it's because Iron Wolf is so bad to many people, and that's why people go well they guess Iron Wolf will go because they are getting another stand-up. I wouldn't mind seeing another B&M inverted, another B&M flyer without taking the ones we have already, and I don't think the general public would think than let's get rid of Superman, and Batman because they are getting another one. It's just because Iron Wolf to a lot of people is bad.

Why do enthusiasts complain about the other inverted coaster at La Ronde? They have an inverted, and they are getting another one. It's because one is an SLC type of ride, and one is a B&M. If Dueling Dragons Fire or Ice came to that park, I really doubt anyone would complain about why another B&M inverted coaster.

Why the hate, and the love for the ride? It's different people. That's why. Some people still like it, and some people on this board hate it. Also, some people are going to be so worried about it being the first B&M ride that they don't want it to ever leave.

And people have said that B&M loves Great America, and that's why they get them. Ummm, I think it's more Great America sought out B&M to get a roller coaster, and they liked them so much, they bought so many. When Iron Wolf was installed, didn't it have different harnesses, and maybe it wasn't so bad in 1990? So, buying more B&Ms was not a problem. I don't know. They bought the next one in 1992 with Batman. To me, the banging the head thing on Iron Wolf wasn't so much a huge problem until they put in new harnesses, what 3 or 4 years ago. Granted, it was still a problem, but at least the harnesses were cushiony rather than rocks.
"I've been staring at the world, waiting. All the trouble and all the pain we're facing. Too much light to be livin' in the dark. Why waste time? We only got one life. Together we can be the CHANGE. So go and let your heart burn bright"
Ilovthevu'

 
Posts: 4398
Images: 0
Joined: June 4th, 2004, 7:54 pm

Postby CoastsToCoasters on June 1st, 2010, 11:09 pm
Yes, LaRonde GOT an SLC (EDNOR), & my old roommate brought up everyone's b$@&in in comparison to SFGAm...We have two wild mouse coasters BUT are they not TWO COMPLETELY different rides by two different manufacturers?! Yes....La Ronde gained a completely new ride experience. As will we with Chang...

now i said what I said basically as a joke only because we have an "alliance" with B&M as thery do with MANY other parks....I say this due to what they have said about us when they came to Cedarpoint(through a friend so I personally cannot confirm :( ), & what they have done for us....were special to them cause we have their first product & their best selling product & this is where it started...look at how many parks have either a Batman clone or an Inverted in general!
CoastsToCoasters

User avatar
 
Posts: 2352
Joined: September 5th, 2005, 12:41 am
Location: Chicago, IL.

Postby UWW-10 on June 1st, 2010, 11:41 pm
Even though the trains are basically Intamin model on a B&M track.....they (the trains) are far from the issue with the ride itself. In other words, *IF* the trains were originally planned to be swapped out for Chang's, it still would not solve much of the issue with the ride sturcture itself.

So, I personally don't see it sticking around much longer. I'm sure they'll dismantle, refurbish, and ship it off somewhere else in the chain that can benefit from it for sure.
UWW-10

User avatar
 
Posts: 441
Joined: January 10th, 2007, 10:38 am
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Postby CoastsToCoasters on June 1st, 2010, 11:53 pm
After bein at the Great Escape, I could see it fittin in really nice there....after all they do have our "Rolling thunder", which was AWESOME! loved it. IronWolf would fit in great there....i just want another B&M to replace it to have that awesome title of 5 in one park! :P
CoastsToCoasters

User avatar
 
Posts: 2352
Joined: September 5th, 2005, 12:41 am
Location: Chicago, IL.

Postby onyxhotel08 on June 2nd, 2010, 12:02 am
The thing is we ALL know a ride is bad when you think if anyone really will miss it when it is gone. All past rides we lost were popular to some extent of feeling terribly sad when they left...Deja Vu, Splash Water Falls, Shockwave....Wolf is not one of them. Last time I rode it in 2009 I said I will NEVER do that to myself again.
13 Years with SFGAm World!
onyxhotel08

User avatar
 
Posts: 2836
Joined: March 6th, 2008, 2:59 pm

Postby CoastsToCoasters on June 2nd, 2010, 12:10 am
That is sad. :(
CoastsToCoasters

User avatar
 
Posts: 2352
Joined: September 5th, 2005, 12:41 am
Location: Chicago, IL.

Postby onyxhotel08 on June 2nd, 2010, 1:26 am
It is the ride has great history but obviously very few people actually care enough to ride it even on busy days Wolf is no busier than a 20-25 minute wait time...time to take it out.
13 Years with SFGAm World!
onyxhotel08

User avatar
 
Posts: 2836
Joined: March 6th, 2008, 2:59 pm

Postby david on June 2nd, 2010, 7:27 am
A few weeks ago, I was at the park and the wait for IW was 45 minutes or less, and it WAS about 35 minutes.
david

 
Posts: 1546
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:29 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Postby Cole on June 2nd, 2010, 7:58 am
david wrote:A few weeks ago, I was at the park and the wait for IW was 45 minutes or less, and it WAS about 35 minutes.

Probabley all first timers.
Top 5: 1) El Toro. 2) Maverick. 3) Millenium Force. 4) Diamondback. 5) X2.
Coaster Count: 167 (41 Wood, 125 Steel)
@Coaster_Cole on Twitter
Cole

 
Posts: 1224
Joined: January 7th, 2010, 4:00 pm
Location: Milwaukee

Postby wishman35 on June 2nd, 2010, 9:08 am
david wrote:A few weeks ago, I was at the park and the wait for IW was 45 minutes or less, and it WAS about 35 minutes.


yeah... that and a 35 minute wait on Wolf isn't a long line considering the load times. They are almost as bad as V2.
wishman35

User avatar
 
Posts: 353
Joined: May 22nd, 2008, 9:23 am
Location: West Suburbs of Chicago IL

Postby SFGAm Viper on June 2nd, 2010, 9:40 am
Since many of you were too young (or maybe not even born!) to remember this, but Iron Wolf used to be glass smooth. I remember it being this way back in 1995. Not sure when it started to get rough but the new harnesses made it much worse.
SFGAm Viper

User avatar
 
Posts: 251
Joined: November 6th, 2003, 11:42 pm
Location: Montgomery, IL

Postby CoastsToCoasters on June 2nd, 2010, 11:01 pm
Hmm well I thought the old harnesses were worse, those ugly smelly reddish & yellow squared ones right?! That was a long time ago, or so it feels. What year did those get replaced with B&M ones?!
CoastsToCoasters

User avatar
 
Posts: 2352
Joined: September 5th, 2005, 12:41 am
Location: Chicago, IL.

Postby FParker185 on June 3rd, 2010, 7:06 pm
I think that was like 2000 or so when the new B&M restraints showed up on Wolf. I personally perfer the old ones by quite a bit cause they were wider, so your head had room to move without hitting anything, made the ride far more comfortable, however yes, after years of wear and not having them refinished all the ride hyde had worn off and it was bare open cell foam that acted like a sponge and absorbed everything it touched. They did have quite the stench especially on hot days.
Favorite Wood Coasters: The Voyage, Ravine Flyer II, Thunderhead, Balder
Favorite Steel: Voltron Nevera, Steel Vengeance, Expedition GeForce, Olympia Looping
Parks visited: 232, Coasters Ridden: Steel: 894, Wood: 179, Total: 1073
FParker185

User avatar
 
Posts: 4508
Joined: February 5th, 2004, 12:04 am
Location: Joliet, IL

Postby CoastsToCoasters on June 5th, 2010, 10:31 pm
That sounds right :)

So I was watchin the Dark Knight Media day video the other day, & just got to thinkin about a comment John Gerdy said during its ceremony about our lineup.... "the kind of out of the box thinking you have with Iron wolf" ....So maybe they do like the fact its a standup, to them bein unique as to why chang will remain just that....? I dont know I'm over thinkin I'm sure. haha
CoastsToCoasters

User avatar
 
Posts: 2352
Joined: September 5th, 2005, 12:41 am
Location: Chicago, IL.

Postby david on June 5th, 2010, 11:02 pm
I think he just meant that it was one of the first stand-up coasters, and it's unique for that.
david

 
Posts: 1546
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:29 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Postby onyxhotel08 on June 7th, 2010, 11:26 pm
You know why I think Wolf is toast?

I do not see the park giving the ride ANY update/rehab work ever. If they wanted to they would have done it already. It is 20 years old. It had a good run. The only way I see it getting some love is IF it is sent to another park WITHOUT a stand up. They will dump it next year or wait a year to find some lame ride to replace it with. I'd rather have empty space in the back where Wolf is than where Splash Water Falls was (in the middle of CF).
13 Years with SFGAm World!
onyxhotel08

User avatar
 
Posts: 2836
Joined: March 6th, 2008, 2:59 pm

Postby david on June 7th, 2010, 11:32 pm
That would be a HUGE empty spot dude! Double SWF's area, at least!

if you don't like it, don't ride it! Don't start arguing that it should be removed only because it's old. :roll:
david

 
Posts: 1546
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:29 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Postby onyxhotel08 on June 7th, 2010, 11:57 pm
AGAIN David, PAY attention. I NEVER said because of old age. Heck Wolf is not the oldest by FAR. I just think it is stupid to think the park will keep Wolf when it has the same type of ride coming in only with a better reputation and Wolf's lines now are no longer than Shockwave's were in the end. Shockwave was taken out for two reasons mainly. It was rough/bad shape and nobody rode it. Otherwise it would still be here. The park knew taking out Shockwave would not upset many people.

Oh and I do have to say again if we got something to cover the whole in County Fair it wouldn't look so bad by Wolf where very few even look in that direction these days. Most just pass by the ride without noticing it.
13 Years with SFGAm World!
onyxhotel08

User avatar
 
Posts: 2836
Joined: March 6th, 2008, 2:59 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Six Flags Great America Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests

Privacy Policy About Us Copyright Disclaimer E-Mail SFGAmWorld
COPYRIGHT - SFGAmWorld.com
All content and images on this site are Copyright 2001 - SFGAmWorld.com and may not be used without permission.
This is NOT the official site of Six Flags Great America, SFGAmWorld.com is not affilated or endorsed by Six Flags Great America.
SFGAmWorld.com does not make any guarantee on the accuracy of the information on this website and cannot be held responsible by the use of this information.
SIX FLAGS and all related indicia are trademarks of Six Flags Theme Parks Inc. ®, TM and © . The official Six Flags site can be found at SixFlags.com
BATMAN, SUPERMAN and all related characters and elements are trademarks of © DC Comics.
LOONEY TUNES and all related characters and elements are trademarks of and © Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.©
The Wiggles Pty Ltd. SCOOBY-DOO and all related characters and elements are trademarks of and © Hanna-Barbera.