SFGAmWorld.com
Untitled Document
Park Information
Latest News
Great America
Roller Coasters
Rides
Hurricane Harbor
Water Slides
Water Attractions
Advertisement

CHANG WATCH: The Official Topic

Talk about anything that has to do with Six Flags Great America and Hurricane Harbor here.
Postby monsterfan99 on April 30th, 2010, 12:36 am
^Not really the same other than a few shared elements. If you have been on Mantis it is ultra similar to that with an extra inversion.
monsterfan99

User avatar
 
Posts: 1693
Joined: September 23rd, 2008, 4:48 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Postby onyxhotel08 on April 30th, 2010, 12:45 am
If Chang was being converted into a floorless/sitdown for 2011, isn't it weird it is still mostly in a yard in Kentucky untouched?
13 Years with SFGAm World!
onyxhotel08

User avatar
 
Posts: 2836
Joined: March 6th, 2008, 2:59 pm

Postby david on April 30th, 2010, 7:33 am
The track has nothing to do with a conversion, even if it is receiving floorless trains, all that would need to be done is a new station, and new software. And the obvious, new trains.
david

 
Posts: 1546
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:29 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Postby Paradise on April 30th, 2010, 9:48 am
Has there ever been a Standup B&M converted to floorless?
Have a take and don't suck, it's the Jim Rome Show!
Paradise

User avatar
 
Posts: 411
Joined: May 31st, 2009, 12:13 pm
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin

Postby w00dland on April 30th, 2010, 12:37 pm
One of the reasons why Six Flags hates this sites is because people go onto their public facebook pages and start blurting out knowledge that they don't want the general public knowing about.

I'm not saying that you can't post stuff on facebook, but be careful where you post it. Six Flags is generally pretty good to the coaster dork population out there, so don't get them angry by doing something stupid.

Oh, and ALWAYS credit other people's work. Doesn't matter if they make money on it or not, copyright is copyright for everything creatively produced.

On to other news, I also find it interesting that this coaster is rumored to get a massive retheme but is currently sitting doing nothing. Wonder if they will paint the coaster after they assemble it at SFGAm.
Top 5 wood-5-Goliath 4-Ravine Flyer II 3-Phoenix 2-Voyage 1-El Toro
Top 5 Steel- 5-Velocicoaster 4- Maverick 3- Fury 325 2-Steel Vengeance 1-X2
Coaster Count: 444
w00dland
Moderator

User avatar
 
Posts: 4630
Joined: January 29th, 2004, 2:36 pm
Location: Winter Haven, FL

Postby david on April 30th, 2010, 3:05 pm
^Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of the GP thinking it's a new ride?
david

 
Posts: 1546
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:29 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Postby onyxhotel08 on April 30th, 2010, 4:07 pm
Chang's paint was somewhat faded and me know Mark said he never liked the name Chang or the lackluster theme the ride had. Paint will probably happen early next spring ala Raging Bull 2008. We also know the train(s) are at the park so no work is being done on them. Looks more and more like Chang will stay the way it is and Iron Wolf will die in the next 2 years.
13 Years with SFGAm World!
onyxhotel08

User avatar
 
Posts: 2836
Joined: March 6th, 2008, 2:59 pm

Postby DejaVuGurl1203 on April 30th, 2010, 4:27 pm
What do they need to do with the trains besides a little bit of maintenance and touch-ups? I'm sure if it was converted to floorless they'd just get entirely new floorless trains. Also, there is still the possibility that they might put Chang's old trains on Iron Wolf if they do convert it to a floorless.
DejaVuGurl1203

User avatar
 
Posts: 4181
Joined: December 28th, 2002, 8:35 pm
Location: Illinois

Postby wishman35 on April 30th, 2010, 5:39 pm
I still don't think it makes sense to have two stand up coasters in the park at the same time. The public won't take very well to it either. Sure Chang is bigger and better than Iron Wolf, but that doesn't defeat the fact that standup coasters don't exactly top the charts in satisfaction surveys.

Dont get me wrong, I enjoy Iron Wolf compared to the majority, in fact I will re ride it multiple times simply because there is never a wait, the ride is fast, and aside from the trains...is in good shape!

I do not see them installing Chang as it is and leaving Iron Wolf in the same season. Either Wolf goes and Chang remains a stand up with a new theme... or .... Chang is converted to something else, and Wolf remains. I hope for the latter by a mile.

There is no need whatsoever to update the park by giving the public an updated way to get a headache. Stand ups just lead to complaints, no matter how good they are.

A Bizzaro type conversion would be probably the best thing for the park.
wishman35

User avatar
 
Posts: 353
Joined: May 22nd, 2008, 9:23 am
Location: West Suburbs of Chicago IL

Postby CoasterNick3157 on April 30th, 2010, 5:39 pm
AsRealAsItGets wrote:Has there ever been a Standup B&M converted to floorless?

I haven't heard besides those diving coasters being converted to floorless trains. Something B&M should do.
If Jim Winrode was still here probally will since he has a good relationship with B&M,
CoasterNick3157

User avatar
 
Posts: 452
Joined: April 4th, 2008, 11:35 pm
Location: Yorkville, IL

Postby onyxhotel08 on May 1st, 2010, 12:00 am
wishman35 wrote:I still don't think it makes sense to have two stand up coasters in the park at the same time. The public won't take very well to it either. Sure Chang is bigger and better than Iron Wolf, but that doesn't defeat the fact that standup coasters don't exactly top the charts in satisfaction surveys.

Dont get me wrong, I enjoy Iron Wolf compared to the majority, in fact I will re ride it multiple times simply because there is never a wait, the ride is fast, and aside from the trains...is in good shape!

I do not see them installing Chang as it is and leaving Iron Wolf in the same season. Either Wolf goes and Chang remains a stand up with a new theme... or .... Chang is converted to something else, and Wolf remains. I hope for the latter by a mile.

There is no need whatsoever to update the park by giving the public an updated way to get a headache. Stand ups just lead to complaints, no matter how good they are.

A Bizzaro type conversion would be probably the best thing for the park.


I am amazed Shockwave was taken down due to nobody basically riding it in the end (and some structure problems) yet Iron Wolf has been a dead zone for years and they still refuse to put it (and whoever is dumb enought o ride it) out of its misery.
13 Years with SFGAm World!
onyxhotel08

User avatar
 
Posts: 2836
Joined: March 6th, 2008, 2:59 pm

Postby tp41190 on May 1st, 2010, 12:33 am
I think it's funny when people say Iron Wolf is "rough".
[read]
tp41190

User avatar
 
Posts: 1523
Joined: April 29th, 2007, 11:57 am
Location: Denver, CO

Postby Cole on May 1st, 2010, 8:24 am
Ahhhhh!!!! Why am I the only one whos enjoying wolfie this season!!!?

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Top 5: 1) El Toro. 2) Maverick. 3) Millenium Force. 4) Diamondback. 5) X2.
Coaster Count: 167 (41 Wood, 125 Steel)
@Coaster_Cole on Twitter
Cole

 
Posts: 1224
Joined: January 7th, 2010, 4:00 pm
Location: Milwaukee

Postby david on May 1st, 2010, 9:31 am
I enjoyed Wolfie, it's just that I rode the "bad train".
david

 
Posts: 1546
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:29 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Postby Paradise on May 1st, 2010, 9:51 am
This is about Chang. Not if you liked Iron Wolf or not.
Have a take and don't suck, it's the Jim Rome Show!
Paradise

User avatar
 
Posts: 411
Joined: May 31st, 2009, 12:13 pm
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin

Postby Cole on May 1st, 2010, 10:00 am
You know guys, chang is 10+ years old. Its only a matter of time it become like wolfie.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Top 5: 1) El Toro. 2) Maverick. 3) Millenium Force. 4) Diamondback. 5) X2.
Coaster Count: 167 (41 Wood, 125 Steel)
@Coaster_Cole on Twitter
Cole

 
Posts: 1224
Joined: January 7th, 2010, 4:00 pm
Location: Milwaukee

Postby david on May 1st, 2010, 10:07 am
The problem on Wolfie is not the track, or anything of that nature, if I'm not mistaken the track is in pristine condition. The problem is the train. It was not built by B&M but rather, Giovanna. Hence, the problem. My dad said the 3rd or 4th year that Wolfie operated, it was pretty bad for a new coaster.

-----------------------

I know this has no credibility, whatsoever. But, I had a dream that Chang had Behemoth trains, full with a splash down. I'm not too keen with the Behemoth trains, but, I do like the idea of a splashdown! :)
david

 
Posts: 1546
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:29 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Postby Paradise on May 1st, 2010, 10:38 am
Behemoth trains? What's that? lol.
Have a take and don't suck, it's the Jim Rome Show!
Paradise

User avatar
 
Posts: 411
Joined: May 31st, 2009, 12:13 pm
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin

Postby Cole on May 1st, 2010, 10:58 am
This I believe?
Image
Top 5: 1) El Toro. 2) Maverick. 3) Millenium Force. 4) Diamondback. 5) X2.
Coaster Count: 167 (41 Wood, 125 Steel)
@Coaster_Cole on Twitter
Cole

 
Posts: 1224
Joined: January 7th, 2010, 4:00 pm
Location: Milwaukee

Postby david on May 1st, 2010, 12:03 pm
Those are indeed Behemoth trains, built by B&M. The last train also has the splashdown mechanism.
david

 
Posts: 1546
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:29 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Postby batcave on May 1st, 2010, 12:15 pm
david wrote:The track has nothing to do with a conversion, even if it is receiving floorless trains, all that would need to be done is a new station, and new software. And the obvious, new trains.


Wrong, you can not just slap any trains on it. They would have to get special floorless trains raised up because the center of gravity on a human on a standup it much higher than on a floorless.


david wrote:The problem on Wolfie is not the track, or anything of that nature, if I'm not mistaken the track is in pristine condition. The problem is the train. It was not built by B&M but rather, Giovanna. Hence, the problem. My dad said the 3rd or 4th year that Wolfie operated, it was pretty bad for a new coaster.

-----------------------

I know this has no credibility, whatsoever. But, I had a dream that Chang had Behemoth trains, full with a splash down. I'm not too keen with the Behemoth trains, but, I do like the idea of a splashdown! :)


Wrong again, the track has cracks everywhere that are continuously being welded. The train is not an issue either. The ride runs beautifully, ride The Incredible Hulk Coaster. Iron Wolf is double the age of Hulk yet still runs smoother. New trains really don't fix much, its more the wheels running on the track that makes the difference.

The only part of your post was "I know this has no credibility"
batcave

User avatar
 
Posts: 229
Joined: February 7th, 2007, 4:17 pm

Postby david on May 1st, 2010, 12:23 pm
Wrong, you can not just slap any trains on it. They would have to get special floorless trains raised up because the center of gravity on a human on a standup it much higher than on a floorless.

That would STILL have nothing to do with the track. Only modifications to the trains. Many on here have repeated that the floorless and the stand-up have the same heart-line.

Wrong again, the track has cracks everywhere that are continuously being welded. The train is not an issue either. The ride runs beautifully, ride The Incredible Hulk Coaster. Iron Wolf is double the age of Hulk yet still runs smoother. New trains really don't fix much, its more the wheels running on the track that makes the difference.

And you know this how? Yes, the TRAIN has to do with the WHEELS. Hence the train being part of the problem.
david

 
Posts: 1546
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:29 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Postby traincrossing9 on May 1st, 2010, 3:02 pm
Found these pictures of Iron Wolf. You guys can decide the real reason why Iron Wolf is rough. And I believe that it uses Intamin trains. This was because it was B&M's first coaster and they weren't making their own trains at the time. Since they branched off from Intamin, they used Intamin trains.
Image

Image

Now back on the topic of Chang, I don't think anyone REALLY knows if the heartlines of floorless and stand-up coasters are the same. IF Chang does come to Great America next year and IF it gets a retheme, I wouldn't be surprised if they got new trains, either standup or floorless, with onboard audio. If it doesn't get a major retheme like the Bizarro makeovers, I think that we'll be seeing the normal Chang trains.
13 - GateKeeper
14 - Millennium Force
15 - Enchanted Tales with Belle
traincrossing9

User avatar
 
Posts: 443
Joined: January 24th, 2008, 2:11 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Postby Cole on May 1st, 2010, 3:24 pm
Chang is a pointless theme.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Top 5: 1) El Toro. 2) Maverick. 3) Millenium Force. 4) Diamondback. 5) X2.
Coaster Count: 167 (41 Wood, 125 Steel)
@Coaster_Cole on Twitter
Cole

 
Posts: 1224
Joined: January 7th, 2010, 4:00 pm
Location: Milwaukee

Postby onyxhotel08 on May 1st, 2010, 3:57 pm
Chang had NO theme
13 Years with SFGAm World!
onyxhotel08

User avatar
 
Posts: 2836
Joined: March 6th, 2008, 2:59 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Six Flags Great America Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests

Privacy Policy About Us Copyright Disclaimer E-Mail SFGAmWorld
COPYRIGHT - SFGAmWorld.com
All content and images on this site are Copyright 2001 - SFGAmWorld.com and may not be used without permission.
This is NOT the official site of Six Flags Great America, SFGAmWorld.com is not affilated or endorsed by Six Flags Great America.
SFGAmWorld.com does not make any guarantee on the accuracy of the information on this website and cannot be held responsible by the use of this information.
SIX FLAGS and all related indicia are trademarks of Six Flags Theme Parks Inc. ®, TM and © . The official Six Flags site can be found at SixFlags.com
BATMAN, SUPERMAN and all related characters and elements are trademarks of © DC Comics.
LOONEY TUNES and all related characters and elements are trademarks of and © Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.©
The Wiggles Pty Ltd. SCOOBY-DOO and all related characters and elements are trademarks of and © Hanna-Barbera.