coasterfreak11 wrote:I think they could put the parking lot that is not used very often into a water park!
Forget about the parking lot, your are doing what Six Flags is doing, taking the easy way out. What about all the land [b]inside[/b] the park not being used.
All of the land inside the park thats not being used is land for coasters. The waterpark should be near it, but not in it, in my opinion.
That is so cheap, Am E being to roller coasters. It's one roller coaster with two sides. If SF wants you to believe that we have 13 instead of 12, they will always get away with it. I guess our carousel is two rides too and Triple Plays three arms are quite different from each other (three rides). I thought that you might say that one side has a extra hill for your argument. I'm sorry, but that's lame!!
Also, I don't consider Spaceley's Sprockets a rc because I've can't go on it. Yes it is a rc, but I discredit Kids coasters because of that. For the record, I say we have 12 rc.
Spacely's definitely is a coaster. I mean, just because it's smaller than say Raging Bull, doesn't mean it's not one.
And with the American Eagle debate, I'm not saying I do or don't think it's two coasters, but both sides of AE can be run separate from each other. Whereas the carousel or Triple Play cannot. So that argument doesn't really make sense. I mean that's like saying there are 32 seats on Raging Bull, times 3 trains, so it's actually 96 rides. Just doesn't make sense...
If you wanted to take one of the sides out of the Am E, could you without destroying the whole coaster? In my opinion, you couldn't because it is built has one. It would be really hard to put a chainsaw down the middle.
Brochure says "Classic double racing wooden roller coaster!"
It does not say roller coasterssss.
